Hot Best Seller

America's Decline: The Education Of A Conservative

Availability: Ready to download

Originally a conservative, Professor Revilo Oliver became an intellectual leader of racialists with a trenchant pen and large following. This collection of popular essays - primarily from 1955-1966, when the postwar struggle for America's soul was at its highest - shows that the conservative cause was inherently not only a lost cause but an unworthy one. Originally a conservative, Professor Revilo Oliver became an intellectual leader of racialists with a trenchant pen and large following. This collection of popular essays - primarily from 1955-1966, when the postwar struggle for America's soul was at its highest - shows that the conservative cause was inherently not only a lost cause but an unworthy one.


Compare

Originally a conservative, Professor Revilo Oliver became an intellectual leader of racialists with a trenchant pen and large following. This collection of popular essays - primarily from 1955-1966, when the postwar struggle for America's soul was at its highest - shows that the conservative cause was inherently not only a lost cause but an unworthy one. Originally a conservative, Professor Revilo Oliver became an intellectual leader of racialists with a trenchant pen and large following. This collection of popular essays - primarily from 1955-1966, when the postwar struggle for America's soul was at its highest - shows that the conservative cause was inherently not only a lost cause but an unworthy one.

41 review for America's Decline: The Education Of A Conservative

  1. 5 out of 5

    Vagabond of Letters, DLitt

    9/10. This book would be approaching the Platonic form of political writing if Oliver didn't have such a 'reprobate mind' when it comes to Christianity. Whoever called Dawkins et al. the new atheists was quite wrong: Oliver was a more caustic 'new atheist' 60 years earlier and with better justification. As far as he sees it, Christianity progressively destroys the West as a vehicle of Judaic subversion and sklavenmoral the more it becomes 'primitive' and 'biblical' (in his view: Zionist, egalitar 9/10. This book would be approaching the Platonic form of political writing if Oliver didn't have such a 'reprobate mind' when it comes to Christianity. Whoever called Dawkins et al. the new atheists was quite wrong: Oliver was a more caustic 'new atheist' 60 years earlier and with better justification. As far as he sees it, Christianity progressively destroys the West as a vehicle of Judaic subversion and sklavenmoral the more it becomes 'primitive' and 'biblical' (in his view: Zionist, egalitarian, lefty, communist, love-thy-refugee, feminist, pacifist) and abandons the Germanic 'accretions' which made it so culture-generative, muscular, and life affirming in the middle ages. Thus he hates it passionately, because he believes it a solemn threat to our shared love of Nation. If only Oliver could have been given to understand that egalitarianism was the original sin, and remains the archetypal sin!

  2. 5 out of 5

    Tommy

    Documents the intellectual development and gyrations of a consistent pea brained anti-communist conservative with selections from his book reviews and essays published in such prestigious journals as National Review and American Opinion. You see herein a pompous brain being progressively melted down... whereas the other buttboys mentioned herein have theirs covertly subsidized perhaps by the international communist conspiracy being carried out by Moscow, the Fabian Society and the Council on For Documents the intellectual development and gyrations of a consistent pea brained anti-communist conservative with selections from his book reviews and essays published in such prestigious journals as National Review and American Opinion. You see herein a pompous brain being progressively melted down... whereas the other buttboys mentioned herein have theirs covertly subsidized perhaps by the international communist conspiracy being carried out by Moscow, the Fabian Society and the Council on Foreign Relations? Many tropes seem to remain the same on the right, even the Judeocentric interpretation of history... it just gets inverted every now and again into a positive or negative fact.

  3. 4 out of 5

    Brvno

  4. 4 out of 5

    Kevin O'Keeffe

  5. 4 out of 5

    Lawrence

  6. 5 out of 5

    Anthony

  7. 4 out of 5

    Gnarly Authenticity .

  8. 4 out of 5

    Gee

  9. 5 out of 5

    Wickstrom

  10. 5 out of 5

    Elise Reich

  11. 4 out of 5

    Anya Leninjav

  12. 4 out of 5

    Tristana

  13. 4 out of 5

    Jewish Librarian

  14. 5 out of 5

    Nile Steinlurch

  15. 4 out of 5

    Limbaugh Balis

  16. 5 out of 5

    A

  17. 5 out of 5

    Phil

  18. 4 out of 5

    Elise Reich

  19. 5 out of 5

    Anthony Bonaventura

  20. 5 out of 5

    Bjc624

  21. 5 out of 5

    M

  22. 4 out of 5

    methadone pretty

  23. 5 out of 5

    Pamela

  24. 5 out of 5

    Lauren

  25. 4 out of 5

    Aurora Ford

  26. 5 out of 5

    Randy Purdy

  27. 5 out of 5

    Shamir

  28. 5 out of 5

    Damian

  29. 5 out of 5

    Donald Forster

  30. 4 out of 5

    Sanjeev

  31. 5 out of 5

    Evgeniy

  32. 4 out of 5

    Viktors Brze

  33. 4 out of 5

    Nėra

  34. 4 out of 5

    Sól Kalika

  35. 5 out of 5

    Tyler

  36. 5 out of 5

    David Morse

  37. 4 out of 5

    Marc Kurtz Jr

  38. 4 out of 5

    Alexey Kraus

  39. 5 out of 5

    0

  40. 5 out of 5

    D

  41. 5 out of 5

    John Morgan

Add a review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Loading...