Hot Best Seller

Nietzsche: A Philosophical Biography

Availability: Ready to download

No other modern philosopher has proved as influential as Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) and none is as poorly understood. In the first new biography in decades, Rüdiger Safranski, one of the foremost living Nietzsche scholars, re-creates the anguished life of Nietzsche while simultaneously assessing the philosophical implications of his morality, religion, and art. Strugg No other modern philosopher has proved as influential as Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) and none is as poorly understood. In the first new biography in decades, Rüdiger Safranski, one of the foremost living Nietzsche scholars, re-creates the anguished life of Nietzsche while simultaneously assessing the philosophical implications of his morality, religion, and art. Struggling to break away from the oppressive burdens of the past, Nietzsche invented a unique philosophy based on compulsive self-consciousness and constant self-revision. As groundbreaking as it will be long-lasting, this biography offers a brilliant, multifaceted portrait of a towering figure.


Compare

No other modern philosopher has proved as influential as Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) and none is as poorly understood. In the first new biography in decades, Rüdiger Safranski, one of the foremost living Nietzsche scholars, re-creates the anguished life of Nietzsche while simultaneously assessing the philosophical implications of his morality, religion, and art. Strugg No other modern philosopher has proved as influential as Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) and none is as poorly understood. In the first new biography in decades, Rüdiger Safranski, one of the foremost living Nietzsche scholars, re-creates the anguished life of Nietzsche while simultaneously assessing the philosophical implications of his morality, religion, and art. Struggling to break away from the oppressive burdens of the past, Nietzsche invented a unique philosophy based on compulsive self-consciousness and constant self-revision. As groundbreaking as it will be long-lasting, this biography offers a brilliant, multifaceted portrait of a towering figure.

30 review for Nietzsche: A Philosophical Biography

  1. 4 out of 5

    Matthew Linton

    A biography with clear cut pros and cons. Here is a brief enumeration of both: Pros: 1. Great introductory biography for those unfamiliar with Nietzsche's life and writings. Safranski outlines Nietzsche's thought in clear, elegant prose requiring little previous philosophical background to understand. 2. Stays focused on Nietzsche's philosophy and doesn't get sucked into the petty details of his life or those of the age he lived in. 3. Lacks any glaring distortions of Nietzsche's philosophy. Acknowl A biography with clear cut pros and cons. Here is a brief enumeration of both: Pros: 1. Great introductory biography for those unfamiliar with Nietzsche's life and writings. Safranski outlines Nietzsche's thought in clear, elegant prose requiring little previous philosophical background to understand. 2. Stays focused on Nietzsche's philosophy and doesn't get sucked into the petty details of his life or those of the age he lived in. 3. Lacks any glaring distortions of Nietzsche's philosophy. Acknowledges shortcomings in Nietzsche's thought and how they led his sullied reputation during the post-war period. Cons: 1. The last chapter is a complete disaster. Aside from almost plagiarizing the work of Aschheim, the topic is too large to be covered in one chapter. By taking on too much material, the final chapter lacks focus and ends the book on a low note. 2. His apologetic treatment of Martin Heidegger in the final chapter. Safranski refuses to acknowledge the controversy that has arisen from Heidegger's appropriation of Nietzsche during World War II. I understand that Safranski has written a biography of Heidegger and likely believes Heidegger has been unfairly condemned for his flirtations with Nazism, but he should have acknowledged the controversy. 3. I would have liked more comparison between philosophical works. There are a few comparisons made, but it would have been interesting if Safranski illustrated more explicitly how Nietzsche's philosophy changed from the Birth of Tragedy to his later unpublished writings. Overall, this isn't my favorite Nietzsche biography (I am still partial to R.J. Hollingdale's biography), but Safranski provides a solid introduction to Nietzsche's life and oeuvre. I would recommend it to those who have some philosophical background and are looking for a general book on Nietzsche's philosophy as background reading before reading Nietzsche for themselves.

  2. 5 out of 5

    Erik Graff

    I prefer Kaufmann, Danto and Hollingdale to Safranski's treatment of Nietzsche's philosophical development, perhaps because they tend toward portraying his thought as more coherent than Safranski does. This is not to say he's wrong and they're right. It may simply amount to my own predilections for systems and system building. I am, after all, most attracted to Kant and to interpretations of Nietzsche which put him within that tradition, albeit as towards the radical side of things. Safranski at I prefer Kaufmann, Danto and Hollingdale to Safranski's treatment of Nietzsche's philosophical development, perhaps because they tend toward portraying his thought as more coherent than Safranski does. This is not to say he's wrong and they're right. It may simply amount to my own predilections for systems and system building. I am, after all, most attracted to Kant and to interpretations of Nietzsche which put him within that tradition, albeit as towards the radical side of things. Safranski at times made me think I was reading FN through Martin Heidegger, which might be simply a way of admitting that I found him, like Heidegger, obscurant--or simply difficult. Still, Safranski is known for his study of the latter. At other times I found him to be (over-?) emphasizing the aesthetic side of FN's concerns. Throughout, Safranski paints a picture of a thinker all over the place, inconsistent to an extreme, thinking tied strongly to passing moods and obsessional themes (see the recent 'I Am Dynamite' biography for a fuller exposition of this). As Nietzsche himself wrote of his own works, in 1888, "In all seriousness, I really never knew what they signified. I would be lying if I claimed that they (apart from Zarathustra) had impressed me."

  3. 4 out of 5

    Domhnall

    "It is absolutely unnecessary and not even desirable for you to argue in my favour; on the contrary, a dose of curiosity, as if you were looking at an alien planet with ironic distance, would strike me as an incomparably more intelligent attitude towards me." This "philosophical biography" provides a thoughtful, chronological overview of the key ideas contained in Nietzsche's writings, taking each book in turn, but I would hesitate to respond by offering a review of Nietzsche. He himself, when he "It is absolutely unnecessary and not even desirable for you to argue in my favour; on the contrary, a dose of curiosity, as if you were looking at an alien planet with ironic distance, would strike me as an incomparably more intelligent attitude towards me." This "philosophical biography" provides a thoughtful, chronological overview of the key ideas contained in Nietzsche's writings, taking each book in turn, but I would hesitate to respond by offering a review of Nietzsche. He himself, when he considered producing a comprehensive statement of his philosophy in a major work to be entitled "The Will to Power," had the insight that this would be redundant, since he had already published all that required saying and provided his own key in the form of a new preface for each book, which he wrote in 1886 for a new publisher. I am not convinced that all that work can be condensed into one volume or that it can be conveyed in calm prose. The book does suggest that Nietzsche's ideas are intelligible and coherent, and gives a flavour of his style, so that there is no reason to be deterred from turning to the original works. It is not a substitute for reading what Nietzsche actually wrote. But it gives a lot of guidance to enable readers to approach Nietzsche critically and to avoid becoming submerged in what is certainly going to be very intense and challenging material. I would say that this is a readable and accessible account and that is an achievement to be commended. It was a pleasure to read.

  4. 5 out of 5

    Jonathan Brammer

    Nietzsche is one of those philosophers that you don't just pick up and read and digest and move on. Really you have to wrestle with his ideas over the course of your life. The young and ambitious are attracted to his ideas about rebellion - I think most people, at some point in their lives, view themselves as "exceptional" . . . while the older and experienced readers might be attracted to some of the more of the cynical side of N.'s writing. This biography illuminates some of his more difficult Nietzsche is one of those philosophers that you don't just pick up and read and digest and move on. Really you have to wrestle with his ideas over the course of your life. The young and ambitious are attracted to his ideas about rebellion - I think most people, at some point in their lives, view themselves as "exceptional" . . . while the older and experienced readers might be attracted to some of the more of the cynical side of N.'s writing. This biography illuminates some of his more difficult or obtuse concepts, but I think Nietzsche really defies easy summarizing. Because he can be very indirect(but also one of the most literary and poetic of philosophers), you really have to kind of immerse yourself in his worldview to come out with a coherent set of ideas. That kind of immersion is impossible with this kind of "philosophical biography". Thanks for reading.

  5. 4 out of 5

    Marc

    This is a very handsome introduction to the life and work of the "philosopher with the hammer". Great read. This is a very handsome introduction to the life and work of the "philosopher with the hammer". Great read.

  6. 5 out of 5

    Simon

    Elaborate review of Nietzsche's thought development. Correlates his thinking with many of his predecessors (mostly ancient Greek philosophers like Heraclitus and Socrates, and enlightenment guys like Kant and Spinoza), temporaries (Hegel, Schopenhauer, Max Stirner, Wagner, Strauss), and successors (Freud, Heidegger, Foucault, but no Husserl or Sartre). Safranski uses a chronological order in which themes are very frequently repeated and much of the inconsistencies within Nietzsche's work come fo Elaborate review of Nietzsche's thought development. Correlates his thinking with many of his predecessors (mostly ancient Greek philosophers like Heraclitus and Socrates, and enlightenment guys like Kant and Spinoza), temporaries (Hegel, Schopenhauer, Max Stirner, Wagner, Strauss), and successors (Freud, Heidegger, Foucault, but no Husserl or Sartre). Safranski uses a chronological order in which themes are very frequently repeated and much of the inconsistencies within Nietzsche's work come forward. Sometimes Safranski steps in to elucidate these, but to my taste not frequently enough. Nietzsche and other writers are cited all the time. Like the title says, it is a philosophical biography focusing on the thoughts and intellectual works of Nietzsche. Spicy and concrete details are mostly lacking, which I consider a good thing. Curious in this regard is the authors speculative suggestion, late in the book, that Nietzsche may have been raped as a child and may have harbored homosexual feelings. This is mentioned along the way without further elaboration. Very curious indeed. The writing is pleasant and offers some sublime clarifications of Nietzsche's vague writings. E.g. the concept of the Übermensch is in my opinion finely elucidated in the following: "The Übermensch embodies the sanctification of this world as a response to the "death of God." The Übermensch is free of religion. He has not lost it, but reclaimed it for himself." Likewise the author explains diligently how Nietzsche was strongly opposed to nationalism, racism, anti-semitism, and socialism. I do really like the author's emphasis on an often lost suggestion of Nietzsche of a so-called "bicameral" system in which there is room for both a personal intuitive passionate life combined with a scientific explanatory view of life. "A higher culture must give people "two chambers of the brain, as it were, one to experience science and the other non-science: lying juxtaposed, without confusion, divisible, able to be sealed off; this is necessary to preserve health. The source of power is located in the one region; the regulator, in the other. Illusions, partialities, and passions must provide the heat, while the deleterious and dangerous consequences of overheating must be averted with the aid of scientific knowledge." He takes time to explain the view of how Christianity is a "slave morality" which was used by the weak in the Roman times to take control over their strong masters, by turning weak traits characteristic of low self-esteem (e.g. charity, humility, pity, obedience) into values and strong traits (e.g. egotism, pride) into vices; and how this morality suppresses life. I really enjoyed his explaining of Nietzsche's view of different cultures: "What system of blinders does each culture rely on to shut out the threatening power of the Dionysian and to channel essential Dionysian energies? Nietzsche posed this question fully aware that he was touching on the innermost secrets of each culture. He traced the surreptitious ways of the will to live and discovered how culturally inventive this will to live could be. He traced the surreptitious ways of the will to live and discovered how culturally inventive this will to live could be. To keep its creatures"clinging to life"(1,115;BT§ 18),it wraps them in illusions. It ensures that some choose the "veil of beauty in art" and that others seek metaphysical solace in religion and philosophy in order to be reassured "that under the whirl of phenomena eternal life keeps flowing indestructibly." Still others are captivated by a "Socratic love of knowledge" and are deceived into thinking that knowledge can "heal the eternal wound of existence" (1,115). A mixture of these ingredients yields what we call culture. According to the proportions of the mixture, a culture will be predominantly artistic, such as that of Greek antiquity, or religious and metaphysical, as in the heyday of the Christian West and the eastern Buddhist world, or Socratic, emphasizing knowledge and science." Safranski audaciously explains some of Nietzsche's darker statements about inferior people and how they should be overruled by the strong people, referring to his own tragic solitary life and how he has suffered from his own excessively kind and pitiful character, which was taken advantage of mostly by his malignant mother and sister. Clearly here the author defends Nietzsche. The writing structure is disorganised and repetitive, certain parts could have been much shorter. Some quotes seem to appear several times in each chapter, like the one how one should become master of himself and his virtues. It strikes me as absurd that this is repeated so frequently while the entire amor fati concept is completely neglected. Isn't that one of the core concepts of Thus Spoke Zarathustra: the Übermensch uses his will to power to conquer his past, affirm life and thus take over the role of the deceased God? My main critique is Safranski's inability to grasp that Nietzsche was fully aware of the highly individual nature of one's "knowledge" and one's "values". Wasn't it Nietzsche himself who subjected these things to the will to power, and didn't he clearly designate every individual as a point of will to power? Clearly here, Nietzsche's thought system is his will to power. Safranski designates this as a massive inconsistency within his system, yet in my view it is the point where Nietzsche leaves the universal part of his thoughts and starts designing his own particular truth, his personal philosophy, his will to power, so as to finish his legacy in the history of philosophy. Due to the complexity of the subject I rate it 5 stars as it has given me very fine insight and clarification. I guess much of the chaos and inconsistency has more to do with Nietzsche himself than the author, and I applaud him for his courage and insight to clarify at least some elements of it. Safranski however clearly struggles in this book with this absurdly complex philosophical legacy, and hides behind a thick wall of metaphoric Nietzsche quotes, which leaves a somewhat unsatisfied feeling. Would I have done a better job? Decidedly not.

  7. 5 out of 5

    John

    I first encountered Friedrich Nietzsche in my freshman year at Kenyon College, when my introductory political science class read his Beyond Good and Evil. It was fascinating and challenging, and though I understood the gist of it, there were plenty of aspects of it that went over my head. During my junior year, I abruptly dropped my music major (I picked it up again the next year) and took two classes that—finally—weren’t either English or music courses: computer programming and a political scie I first encountered Friedrich Nietzsche in my freshman year at Kenyon College, when my introductory political science class read his Beyond Good and Evil. It was fascinating and challenging, and though I understood the gist of it, there were plenty of aspects of it that went over my head. During my junior year, I abruptly dropped my music major (I picked it up again the next year) and took two classes that—finally—weren’t either English or music courses: computer programming and a political science seminar devoted to Nietzsche. We began with his On the Genealogy of Morals, which was a fascinating and subversive look at the origins of conventional morality. From here, we moved on to Nietzsche’s literary exposition of his philosophy, Thus Spoke Zarathustra. It was absolutely fascinating, both in its ideas and the style of Nietzsche as translated by Walter Kauffman, and both of these aspects had an influence on me. A couple years ago, while shopping for gifts, I came across this volume and thought it sounded interesting. Well, it was. Take note of the subtitle: “a philosophical biography.” The emphasis is on philosophical, not on biography. This book is about the development of Nietzsche’s ideas; the events of his life are included primarily as they influenced his philosophy or otherwise illuminate the development of his ideas. Enjoying this book is helped if you have at least some familiarity with philosophy in general and/or Nietzsche’s writing. If you don’t have any background in either one, it may still be possible to enjoy this book because of how well written it is, but Safranski doesn’t stop to explain a lot of philosophical terms. That said, it is a really well-written book. Safranski shows us the development of Nietzsche’s philosophy. At the same time, Safranski is not afraid to offer opinions as to where Nietzsche may have gone wrong. It’s also clear to see, alongside Nietzsche’s genius, his profoundly human qualities, his insecurities and imperfections. Safranski concludes his book with an epilogue tracing Nietzsche’s reception and influence in the years after his death. It is, by his own admission, incomplete, but still quite interesting as far as it goes.

  8. 4 out of 5

    Roberts Ozols

    If anyone is planning to dig in the philosophy of Nietzsche, I recommend this book as a good start as it gives you a background on his life and his works. I really liked to follow the development of Nietzsche's ideas and the way he changes it. What I liked the most is the concept on how one avoids from being purely spiritual or purely natural, he views these poles as dangerous. Another, perhaps misunderstanding is the concept of anti-religion. Even though I partly disagree with him in his anti-r If anyone is planning to dig in the philosophy of Nietzsche, I recommend this book as a good start as it gives you a background on his life and his works. I really liked to follow the development of Nietzsche's ideas and the way he changes it. What I liked the most is the concept on how one avoids from being purely spiritual or purely natural, he views these poles as dangerous. Another, perhaps misunderstanding is the concept of anti-religion. Even though I partly disagree with him in his anti-religion sentiment, I liked that he emphasizes that even an irreligious man cannot live without moral, he views morality as a reason why humans have evolved from animals. A logical continuation would be "Thus spoke Zarathustra", unless you want to dig deeper, I liked Rudiger Safranski's analysis of book "Human, all to human" in this book (it was somewhere between 9-12 chapter) as it is where Nietzsche rejects the idea of humanity, probably heavily influencing Oswald Spengler some decades later.

  9. 5 out of 5

    r0b

    I’m not an authority on the subject but I thought this was very good.

  10. 5 out of 5

    Shaun

    I read this for two reasons: one, because the author wrote a philosophical biography of Schopenhauer which I really liked; two, to prepare for my Nietzsche class next semester. I was expecting to like this as much as Safranski's other book. However, I found this book lacking. Although it focuses more on the philosophy rather than the biography, it seemed that the explanations where rather superficial. And yes, they seemed more like explanations rather than justifications. Perhaps the redeeming c I read this for two reasons: one, because the author wrote a philosophical biography of Schopenhauer which I really liked; two, to prepare for my Nietzsche class next semester. I was expecting to like this as much as Safranski's other book. However, I found this book lacking. Although it focuses more on the philosophy rather than the biography, it seemed that the explanations where rather superficial. And yes, they seemed more like explanations rather than justifications. Perhaps the redeeming chapters was on morality and his view on intimacy. Overall, this may be good for hardcore Nietzsche fans, but I thought it was just ok. I'll keep it on my bookshelf for reference, but I doubt I'll read it cover to cover again.

  11. 4 out of 5

    Cormac Zoso

    this was an excellent if not intense bio of my personal favorite philospher ... having been raised in the lutheran church (missouri synod ... or misery synod as i always said) reading the first words of his where he ripped the lutherans was obviosly going to get on my constant reading list (and i almost always have one of his books near at hand as when i need a break or a jolt of hard-core philosophy) ... this was a heacvy read tho so if you're not really into the man, it might be a rough read . this was an excellent if not intense bio of my personal favorite philospher ... having been raised in the lutheran church (missouri synod ... or misery synod as i always said) reading the first words of his where he ripped the lutherans was obviosly going to get on my constant reading list (and i almost always have one of his books near at hand as when i need a break or a jolt of hard-core philosophy) ... this was a heacvy read tho so if you're not really into the man, it might be a rough read ... but for his fans, required reading

  12. 5 out of 5

    Ethan

    I guess the main joke is "Keep your friends close..." Trying to figure out what the hell this guy was talking about is an interest of many, and as Safranski points out Nietzsche's thoughts never had any conclusion and all we can do is wander around through self-contradictory mazes, get syphilis and die. *sad trombone* I guess the main joke is "Keep your friends close..." Trying to figure out what the hell this guy was talking about is an interest of many, and as Safranski points out Nietzsche's thoughts never had any conclusion and all we can do is wander around through self-contradictory mazes, get syphilis and die. *sad trombone*

  13. 4 out of 5

    Danimausi

    Nietzsche one of the German clichés, more frequent quotated as he could be very funny, but never readed or understanded beyond what his sister and Mr. Chamberlains protonazism, I'm still waiting for a good book about the Nietscheancountry she and her husband trying to stablish in Paraguay. Nietzsche one of the German clichés, more frequent quotated as he could be very funny, but never readed or understanded beyond what his sister and Mr. Chamberlains protonazism, I'm still waiting for a good book about the Nietscheancountry she and her husband trying to stablish in Paraguay.

  14. 5 out of 5

    Pablo

    Safranski is quickly becoming one of my favorite authors.

  15. 5 out of 5

    Catherine Judd

    Thank you Rudiger Safranski for this important and indispensable biography of Nietzsche.

  16. 5 out of 5

    Irakli Kandelaki

    I like this book.

  17. 5 out of 5

    Zhijing Jin

    The author is good at using beginner-friendly language for complicated philosophical ideas. For Nietzsche's thoughts, one of them (as far as I understand) is the problem of rationalism, which is prevalently replacing the religions in his age. The problem is that it places humans in a minor role, and the world is about science and rationality. This brings danger to human being because humans can be unsure about the purpose of their lives since humans are also part of the material world. The balanc The author is good at using beginner-friendly language for complicated philosophical ideas. For Nietzsche's thoughts, one of them (as far as I understand) is the problem of rationalism, which is prevalently replacing the religions in his age. The problem is that it places humans in a minor role, and the world is about science and rationality. This brings danger to human being because humans can be unsure about the purpose of their lives since humans are also part of the material world. The balance between Dionysus (enjoyment) and Apollo ideology can be viewed as the men's pursuit of art and science. Other arguments include that he thinks society should distribute more resources from ordinary people to scientists and artists; he dislikes that Christianity puts people in a guilty, weak position, but he prefers the ancient Greek society which allows people to follow their own feelings, since even Greek gods are prone to shortnesses and desires.

  18. 4 out of 5

    Piet

    Although most of the subject matter was beyond me I have to admit that the author did a very thorough and sincerely felt job. I still do not understand the meaning of the eternal comeback or the will to power but I have been made curious or interested to try and find out more about them. The book certainly makes you feel sympathy for the tragic figure of Friedrich Nietzsche ( who I already knew a little from Irving Yalom's impressive book When Nietzsche Wept ) and I certainly get the impression th Although most of the subject matter was beyond me I have to admit that the author did a very thorough and sincerely felt job. I still do not understand the meaning of the eternal comeback or the will to power but I have been made curious or interested to try and find out more about them. The book certainly makes you feel sympathy for the tragic figure of Friedrich Nietzsche ( who I already knew a little from Irving Yalom's impressive book When Nietzsche Wept ) and I certainly get the impression that Rudiger Safranski's IQ is much higher than mine. I see this book as a stimulus to try and understand more of a philosopher who is quoted in every issue of the Dutch philosophical magazine "Filosofie" and who was the hero of my deceased second brother.

  19. 4 out of 5

    SB

    excellent introduction to N.'s body of works but it really should not be called a 'philosophical biography' as the biographical side of this volume is extremely slim (although Safranski makes use of little known excerpts from N's notebooks and correspondence which shed new light on several episodes in the man's life). Between this and Sue Prideaux's recent biography ('I am Dynamite') one can almost form a full yet still 'general' sort of picture of N, his historical context, and his intellectual excellent introduction to N.'s body of works but it really should not be called a 'philosophical biography' as the biographical side of this volume is extremely slim (although Safranski makes use of little known excerpts from N's notebooks and correspondence which shed new light on several episodes in the man's life). Between this and Sue Prideaux's recent biography ('I am Dynamite') one can almost form a full yet still 'general' sort of picture of N, his historical context, and his intellectual milieu. The bibliographies at the end will prove very useful to any Anglophone with no access to the vast body of German-langauge 'Nietzschology'.

  20. 5 out of 5

    Brady Dale

    I know people say this book is great, but I didn't think the throughlines were as strong as they could have been. It was both biography and summary of Nietzsche's work, without doing an amazing job of either, to be honest. I think I need to read at least one more biography of Nietzsche, at least. He's a complicated guy, of course. This just didn't nail it for me like I was led to expect it would. I know people say this book is great, but I didn't think the throughlines were as strong as they could have been. It was both biography and summary of Nietzsche's work, without doing an amazing job of either, to be honest. I think I need to read at least one more biography of Nietzsche, at least. He's a complicated guy, of course. This just didn't nail it for me like I was led to expect it would.

  21. 4 out of 5

    J.W. Thompson

    Eminently readable, with a great balance between biographical detail and the developments of Nietzsche's thought. It invites you to go deeper into understanding his philosophy without trying to summarise or reduce it to a nutshell. Eminently readable, with a great balance between biographical detail and the developments of Nietzsche's thought. It invites you to go deeper into understanding his philosophy without trying to summarise or reduce it to a nutshell.

  22. 4 out of 5

    Carla Ramirez

    Clearly any author taking a note from this lunatic is beyond me. He does and clearly states he is not clear in thoughts nor opinions simply going by his loony mind. I’m not continuing to read.

  23. 4 out of 5

    Alauddin Ahmed

    Way better than Walter Kaufman's Nietzsche :philosopher, psychologist and antichrist. Kaufman tried really hard to portray Nietzsche as a modern liberal. And that's why reading that will be misleading for a beginner. I would recommend this book for an introduction. It is really easy to read,not rife with jargon, and gives a chronologically clearer view of Nietzsche's philosophy and the developments his thoughts went through. Reading this book was a really pleasant experience. Way better than Walter Kaufman's Nietzsche :philosopher, psychologist and antichrist. Kaufman tried really hard to portray Nietzsche as a modern liberal. And that's why reading that will be misleading for a beginner. I would recommend this book for an introduction. It is really easy to read,not rife with jargon, and gives a chronologically clearer view of Nietzsche's philosophy and the developments his thoughts went through. Reading this book was a really pleasant experience.

  24. 5 out of 5

    Devin

    A dense book about Nietzsche’s journey with philosophy. I read this to decide whether or not to attempt one of Nietzsche’s books, and I’m still torn on the issue. I’m glad I read this book, however, as it gave me a fuller perspective with which to approach his work. “There is no point of arrival in Nietzsche’s philosophy, no outcome, and no end result. There is only the will to an unceasing adventure in thinking.”

  25. 5 out of 5

    James Henderson

    Safranski examines the intersection of Nietzsche's life and thought in this impressive and thoughtful biography. In doing so he presents a reappraisal of Nietzsche's philosophy, his relationships with others including Wagner, and his many interests including music and literature. In his concluding remarks, the author offers this comment about his project: "Nietzsche's philosophical biography is a story without an end and will need to continue being written" (p 349). This notion of "philosophical Safranski examines the intersection of Nietzsche's life and thought in this impressive and thoughtful biography. In doing so he presents a reappraisal of Nietzsche's philosophy, his relationships with others including Wagner, and his many interests including music and literature. In his concluding remarks, the author offers this comment about his project: "Nietzsche's philosophical biography is a story without an end and will need to continue being written" (p 349). This notion of "philosophical biography" is central to the conception of the book, which delves into Nietzsche's life only insofar as it informs his thought. As Safranski points out, Nietzsche's "life was a testing ground for his thinking" (28) and hence cannot be treated separately from his work.

  26. 4 out of 5

    Denton Peter McCabe

    An interesting look at Nietzsche's life, not in terms of his experiences but in terms of his writings. The best thing about this text is that each chapter will attempt to cross reference his writings from earlier and later in his career. I think this is essential reading for any student of Nietzsche, Philosophy, Critical Theory, etc. I will be reading the books on Nietzsche by Heidegger, Deleuze, and Bataille in the very near future!! An interesting look at Nietzsche's life, not in terms of his experiences but in terms of his writings. The best thing about this text is that each chapter will attempt to cross reference his writings from earlier and later in his career. I think this is essential reading for any student of Nietzsche, Philosophy, Critical Theory, etc. I will be reading the books on Nietzsche by Heidegger, Deleuze, and Bataille in the very near future!!

  27. 5 out of 5

    Dries

    So far.. Safranski, like always, is so clear. Short easy readable chapters discussing themes in Nietzsches life are really helping me getting an insight in Nietzsches life and putting his books in a better perspective. Joy to read! Although offcourse you have to find Nietzsche interesting as a person. If you ever manage to get your head around him that is..!

  28. 4 out of 5

    Mike Burmeister

    his philosophies werent bent at best sometimes

  29. 5 out of 5

    Anna

    Well written biography of Nietzsche explaining his life in manner underandable for intelligent person, who knows who Nietzsche was and what was the basic of his philosophy.

  30. 5 out of 5

    Hollis

    A thought-provoking biography of the great philosopher.

Add a review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Loading...